**Grahame Gardner**

Sacred Geometry is one of the three main foundations of western geomancy (the other two being dowsing and astronomy – astrology). Whenever we wish to commune with our Gods, meditate, worship, contact our higher selves, whatever name we give to the practice; we tend to disassociate ourselves from the everyday mundane world by going to a place that has some spiritual meaning for us. Whether this is a church, temple, stone ring or simply a corner of our bedroom, the concept is the same. Most of these places (with the possible exception of the last) are *sacred spaces* constructed using sacred geometry.

Sacred Geometry depends on the use of what are called *irrational numbers*. These are numbers like *Pi* (Π) and *Phi* (Φ), where the decimal part is infinitely long and non-repeating. Pi is also a special kind of irrational number called a *transcendental* number, but we won’t go into that here because it’s defined more by what it *isn’t *than what it is, and in any case it’s not relevant to this discussion [1] .

Some irrational numbers are so commonly known that they have names; Pi, Phi, Feigenbaum’s constant and the Comma of Pythagoras are just a few examples. Others are known only by their function; √2, √3, √5 for instance. They are found to be an inherent component of many natural processes and structures, and form an integral part in the design of sacred spaces. From Stonehenge to Chartres cathedral, from Maes Howe to the Great Pyramid, you will find irrational numbers underpinning the layout of the space. I say underpinning, because they are never openly manifest. They appear only in the relationship of one quantifiably measurable part to another (another name for irrationals is *incommensurate *numbers). To understand the importance of these numbers, we need to delve deeper into the noble and ancient art of Sacred Geometry.

Sacred Geometry deals with our perception and definition of space. It is the Universal framework whereby the spiritual manifests into the material. Spaces constructed using the principles of sacred geometry act as a bridge between the worlds, and sacred geometric forms naturally produce dowseable energy fields. It makes no difference if it’s a chalk circle on your living-room carpet or the dizzying architecture of a Gothic cathedral; the principles are exactly the same. To the masons who raised the great Gothic cathedrals and other places of worship, sacred geometry was of paramount importance to the construction; indeed no religious establishment could be expected to function properly without it. The spaces are designed to be uplifting to the spirit, to *resonate* on a subconscious level in such a way that the possibility of a spiritual connection is maximised. An impressive side effect of sacred geometry is that many of these structures possess extraordinary acoustic properties, a result of the inter-related harmonic structure behind both music and geometry. Certain types of music (e.g. Bach) were designed to be sacred geometry you can hear, so it is little wonder the buildings resonate with it.

In ancient times it was believed that numbers are the underlying reality behind all things. All things were linked through number and could be manifested through number. Number expressed in time is music, number expressed in space is geometry, and number expressed in space-time is astrology. Just as astrology can provide us with a map of consciousness, so can geometry. These concepts underlie the entire world-view of the ancients but have largely been forgotten in our modern hyper-rational scientific orthodoxy. We’ve lost sight of the spiritual qualities of number and shape by our emphasis on brute quantity and hard computation. We’re taught to see numbers as mere *quantities,*instead of possessing qualities and characters with distinct personalities, resonating with each other and Universe in a harmonious cosmic dance (it used to be called Music of the Spheres). And this is why irrational numbers are so fascinating to the geometer; they cannot ever be expressed as a *quantity*, they can only be appreciated as *qualities*. They are the inner, esoteric face of number, becoming visible only in the relationships between parts. I think of them as the cracks between the paving stones of reality. The Pythagoreans of ancient Greece, who are credited with discovering the infinite nature of these numbers in the sixth century B.C., were so puzzled and awe-struck by their discovery that they tried to keep it a secret by proscribing the death penalty for those who would divulge it. [2]

Before we go any further, we’re going to have to take a brief mathematical foray to look at numbers. Now don’t panic; things are really not as complicated as they seem. There are only a small handful of basic concepts that you need to grasp. If you can remember Pythagoras’ theorem on right-angled triangles that states that the square on the hypotenuse (the long side) is equal to the sum of the squares on the other two sides (a^{2}+b^{2}=c^{2}), you’ll be fine with sacred geometry.

However it is important to note that this is a *formula*, which is part of *algebra*. Algebra has nothing whatsoever to do with sacred geometry, and in fact was a much later invention of the thirteenth century. The original theorem comes from geometry, and can be proven by geometry. The key is in the wording.

Let’s look at the most basic of the right-angled triangles, what is known as the 3-4-5 triangle (Fig 1). The corner with the little square in it is a right angle (90^{o}). The lengths of the sides are shown as 3,4 and 5 units. The theorem says that the *square* on the long side is equal to the sum of the*squares* on the other two sides. It literally means just that. So if we draw squares on those sides, suddenly we see things in a new light (Fig. 2).

Here we’ve drawn square grids on each side of the triangle according to the unit length; so 3×3, 4×4 and 5×5 squares. We can easily see that the number of*squares* on the long side is 25. The theorem states that this is equal to the sum of the *squares*on the other two sides. On those we have grids of 9 squares and 16 squares. 9 + 16 = 25 *squares*. Hence the length of the long side of the triangle is the *square root* of 25, which is of course 5. As long as we know the length of any two of the sides in a right-angled triangle, we can work out the length of the remaining side using this method. Now that wasn’t too bad, was it? And that’s about as complicated as things need to get in sacred geometry.

We have seen that Sacred Geometry is interested in *irrational* numbers. These numbers are the cornerstone of sacred geometry because they effectively manifest the infinite in normal space. For a practical example of this, let’s take a look at an ancient example of sacred space, the King’s Chamber in the Great Pyramid. The shape of this is a form known as a *double cube*. That is, the long sides are twice the length of the short sides. Consider just the floor area for the moment – long side twice the length of the short side remember – the floor would be a double-square rectangle (Fig. 3). The important thing about the double-square is the diagonal. If we say that the short side of the square has a length of one unit, then the long side has a length of 2 units (these can be anything you like – sacred geometry is only interested in proportions and ratios, not actual measurements. It doesn’t matter if the units are inches, metres, or aardvarks). That means that a diagonal of this rectangle will have a length equal to the square root of five (by Pythagoras’ theorem: hypotenuse^{2} = 2^{2} + 1^{2} = 4 + 1 = 5, therefore hypotenuse =√5 ).

Now the square root of five (2.236…) is another one of those irrational numbers that can’t be calculated precisely. It goes on forever, never repeating, always changing. So it can be quite accurately said that in a sense, you cannot ever measure this diagonal exactly. It represents the infinite. Both diagonals of this rectangle are root 5, so if you were to stand exactly at the centre of this double-square rectangle, you stand in the centre of a harmoniously proportioned space, but you also stand at the crossing point of two diagonals of *incommensurable* length [3] .

What better space to commune with the One?

Let’s take a look at some other basic shapes and ratios as we take a tour of the numbers One through Five. Along with Pi (Π) and Phi (Φ), the main irrationals used are the square roots of 2, 3 and 5, and combinations thereof, like the √2:√3 proportions prevalent in Chartres cathedral [4] . It’s too large a subject to cover fully here, but this will give you a basic grasp of the important concepts involved.

**The Circle: **Simplest shape of all, and manifestation of the One. Draw a circle around yourself and you immediately distinguish your personal space from your surroundings. That’s really the power of the circle. It is the first expression of Universe; a horizon, a boundary between Self and Other. With no beginning and no end, the circle’s circumference is a profound statement about the transcendental nature of reality. Defined as ‘an infinite number of points equidistant from a centre’, the circle in its manifestation implies the divine generation of shape and form from nothing to everything.

The irrational number that the circle generates is, of course, Pi (Π=3.1415926….). The circumference is calculated from the radius by the formula 2Π*r*, where *r* is the radius of the circle. Because of the use of Pi, we cannot ever know the value of both the radius and the circumference in whole-number units. If either the radius or circumference is measurable in whole, rational units, then the other will always be an endless, irrational decimal. Thus the circle represents the limited and the limitless in one body.

Examples of sacred spaces based upon the circle are Stonehenge, Ring of Brodgar in Orkney, and the Merry Maidens circle in Cornwall. Most of what we call ‘stone circles’ are not true circles, but more complex geometrical forms. A more accurate term would be ‘stone rings’, and you do see this being used in some literature today. Some researchers think that the complicated compound outlines of the rings were attempts to produce whole-number circumferences and radii in a quest for sacred geometric perfection; however research by the EEG seems to indicate that the ring will have greater beneficial earth energy effects the closer the perimeter divided by the sum of the two axes approximates the Golden Mean of 1.61803… [5] .

**The Vesica Piscis:** The circle divides, the One becomes Two. Something generates Other. The circle replicates by contemplating itself, reflecting its light, and casting an identical shadow. Now we have two separate *qualities,* but they are still in the Void, distinct and without interaction. Nothing can happen until they merge, and then we have a concept of Three-ness and true manifestation can begin. To the ancients, Three was the first proper number; One and Two were abstract principles, un-manifest. The shape formed by two overlapping circles is called the *vesica piscis* (Fig. 4).* *The vesica piscis embodies all the concepts of duality that you can think of; the two circles both attract and repel each other, giving polarity and tension, whilst the overlapping area gives us a portal of manifestation.

Any two circles that overlap will produce a *vesica* (the overlapping area), but only two circles of identical size whose centres are located on the circumference of the other produce a *vesica piscis *(it’s Latin for ‘bladder of the fish’). This ancient symbol is significant in esoteric Christian lore, and forms the basis for the ‘fish’ sigil that was used initially as a secret sign between early Christians and is now seen most often decorating car bumpers. But the symbol is much older than Christianity. The vesica doesn’t just represent a fish bladder; it’s really about the birth portal, the cosmic Yoni of the Goddess. Imagine looking up from between her outstretched thighs and you’ll get the picture. All subsequent numbers and geometric shapes can be produced through the portal of the vesica using the geometer’s tools, but regrettably that is beyond the scope of this article.

The irrational number produced by the vesica piscis is the square root of 3. If the radius of each of the circles is 1 unit, then a vertical line drawn down the centre of the vesica has a length of root 3 (√3=1.7320…).

The vesica piscis crops up a lot in sacred architecture, but perhaps its most obvious manifestation is the Gothic arch, bastion of so many of our spiritual buildings. A Gothic arch is basically the vesica part with vertical extensions from the centre of the sides. Less obvious manifestations of the vesica are in the floor plans of many churches and chapels where the vesica defines the dimensions of the rectangular layout. The Mary chapel in Glastonbury Abbey is said to be the most perfect example of this [6] . The vesica is also representative of the shape of the human aura, and is used as such in many religious paintings. This has an interesting symbolism; if the two circles of the vesica piscis are seen as Heaven and Earth, then the vesica part represents the bridge between the two – or in other words, Jesus and the established Church. This is why you often see the figure of Christ enclosed in a vesica-shaped aura on the front of churches [7] .

**The Square:** The Square symbolises the imposition of structure upon the earth. Instead of the limitless circle of the One, we now have the orientation and implied directions of the Four. Four quarters. Four directions. Four winds. Four elements… and so on. We’re perhaps more familiar with this shape than any other, since it permeates our lives in practically everything we build or make (Fig 5).

In working with sacred space, the important bit of the square is the diagonal. If the square has sides of 1 unit in length, then the length of the diagonal is the square root of 2 (√2=1.41421…). You can easily prove this for yourself using Pythagoras’ theorem. Again, this is an irrational number. Stand in the centre of the square and you stand at the centre of two theoretically infinite lines. A classical example of this was the Holy of Holies in Solomon’s Temple. That’s the bit that nobody was allowed into, where they kept the Ark. A more contemporary incarnation is the *Kaaba* in Mecca.

The combination of the square and the circle represents the fusion of heaven and earth, and ‘squaring the circle’ is regarded as the pinnacle of the sacred geometer’s art. This means producing a circle overlaying a square such that *either* the circumference of the circle equals the perimeter of the square, *or* the area of the circle equals that of the square. John Michell has produced possibly the most aesthetic example of this using the dimensions of the earth and moon, [8] but space precludes us going into that here.

Many early religious buildings were designed using this squared-circle geometry, perhaps most famously the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, one of the oldest Christian churches in existence, commissioned by the Emperor Justinian and completed in 532 c.e. Its square form with staggering 180-foot high hemispherical dome is still a wonder to behold. It was the largest enclosed space *on the planet* for over a thousand years. Interestingly, when Constantinople fell to the Turks, the building was converted into a mosque and the beautiful gold mosaics of the interior painted over. But its form was considered so perfect that all subsequent mosques in Istanbul were modelled on it, and so the squared circle form was introduced to Islam. Many years later, the West took the design of the Gothic arch from Islamic architecture, so it seems a fair trade!

**The Double Square: **As it sounds,** **two squares side by side. A rectangle with short side of 1 unit and long sides of 2. This represents the 2:1 ratio of the octave in musical terms. We looked at this shape earlier as the basis of the King’s Chamber in the Great Pyramid (Fig. 3); it’s also the shape of ‘The Holy Place’ in Solomon’s Temple. That was the main part of the temple, not quite as sacred as the Holy of Holies.

**The Pentagram and the Golden Proportion:** The four terms of the square are enough to account for the idea of matter, or substance. But when we get to Five we introduce the concept of Spirit, or governing intelligence; or in other words Life. Five is seen as the union of Two (female) and Three (male). Thus the five-sided pentagon and in particular the pentagram star within it symbolises life and regeneration. It also manifests one of nature’s most startling proportional relationships, the Golden Mean. [9]

The Golden Proportion, Golden Section or Golden Mean is one of Nature’s universal constants, perhaps the most difficult to get your head around, but also the most cosmic. It is a proportion that is found all around us, in the growth patterns of all living things, the proportions of our own bodies, and in classical architecture to name but a few instances; and yet goes largely unnoticed by most. It’s hard to understand by definition, but relatively easy to grasp once you see some examples of it. It seems to be programmed into our very minds, in that we tend to pick out items embodying Golden Mean principles as being the most ‘visually pleasing’ to us, in the same way that a major fifth is the most ‘aurally pleasing’ subdivision of the octave in music. Indeed our entire concept of beauty is determined by how closely the facial features of others approach Golden Mean proportions. By definition, it’s a way of dividing something into two unequal parts, such that: whole/large part = large part/small part = Phi (Φ). Numerically, the ratio is 1:1.61803… and of course this is another irrational number.

But we can understand the Phi proportion better if we see some instances of it; so let’s look at the Golden Proportion as it manifests itself geometrically. In sacred geometry, where all forms (and therefore numbers) are generated through the cosmic birth-portal of the vesica piscis, the pentagon/pentagram is the third such form to emerge after the triangle and square, and is the first in which the Golden Proportion has to be ‘invoked’ in order to draw it (Fig. 6). It’s relatively difficult to draw accurately geometrically, and this is partly why it has developed the occult associations that it has today (if you would like to learn how to construct one, click here). It was worn as a hidden sign of recognition by advanced initiates of the Pythagorean mystery school around 500 BCE and, one thousand years later, the secrets of its construction were kept in the oral tradition, revealed only to initiates of the Craft Guilds and Masons that built the great gothic cathedrals. It wasn’t until 1509 that the monk Fr. Luca Pacioli, who was the mathematics teacher of Leonardo da Vinci, let the cat out of the bag when he published the secret in his book ‘De Divina Porportione’. [10]

The Pentagram is interesting to the sacred geometer because it embodies the Golden Proportion in every single part of it (Fig. 7). For example: look at the top horizontal crossing leg of the figure. From one point to where it crosses the next line, call that one unit. From where it crosses the line to the opposite point is 1.618… or Phi. The relationship or proportion of the first part to the larger part *is the same as the larger part is to the whole line.* The smaller is to the larger as the larger is to the whole. The same proportion is repeated throughout the Pentagram. Every part of it is in some sort of Phi relationship to every other part. It is a truly remarkable figure.

Because if its self-symmetry and use of the Golden Proportion, the pentagram contains within itself the seed of its own replication in progressively smaller or larger scales (Fig. 8). Today we call this *fractal* geometry. It is the governing template of nature.

Archaeologists have found pentagrams on Mesopotamian potsherds dating back to 3500 BCE. Pentagrams also appear in ancient Egyptian, Greek and Roman art. The use of the pentagram in Christian sacred geometry is due in no small part to the writings of Hildegard of Bingen, the twelfth century Benedictine nun and abbess. For her, the pentagram was the central symbol of the microcosm, the reflection on Earth of the divine plan and the divine image. Hildegard saw the pentagram as representing the human form because we have five senses – sight, smell, hearing, taste, and touch; and five extremities – two legs, two arms and a head. And, because humankind was made in God’s image, she also saw the pentagram as representing God. Other Christians saw the symbol as representing the five wounds of Christ and, as such, it was considered a potent protection against evil. Earlier Hebrew tradition associated the pentagram with the Pentateuch, the first five books of the bible. In the late Middle Ages, the pentagram became a symbol of knightly virtues. In the poem *Sir Gawain and the Green Knight*, the points of the pentagram symbolise chastity, chivalry, courtesy, generosity, and piety. During the Inquisition, the inverted pentagram became associated with evil and the Devil. The pentagram was thought to represent the head of a goat, the devil, or a witch’s foot. Regrettably the pentagram still carries these associations today for many people, but it is a gross debasement of such a truly Divine symbol.

In architecture, the Golden Mean has been used for millennia to design buildings, and can be easily spotted in many a classical façade, usually as a series of Phi rectangles (Fig. 9).

To make a Phi Rectangle, we begin with a square. Now divide the square into two equal parts by drawing a vertical line exactly down the middle. Place your compasses at the bottom point of this line (i.e. in the centre of the base line of the square), and set the radius to one of the top corners of the square. Draw an arc down to where the base line of the square would be if it was extended, and then do that very thing until the base line cuts the arc. Do the same thing from the top point of the vertical line, and extend the top side of the square outwards until it cuts that arc. Connect those two new points with a vertical line, and there you have your Phi rectangle. You can spot this Phi rectangle in buildings ancient and modern, from the Parthenon of Athens to the United Nations building in New York.

Let’s delve a little deeper. If you were to subdivide this second rectangle by making a square within it (Fig. 10), thus making a smaller rectangle, then the relationship of the smaller rectangle to the larger rectangle will be the same as the larger rectangle is to the whole figure. You now effectively have two rectangles with a Phi relationship, and they are both Golden rectangles. If you keep on doing this sequence of square, golden rectangle, smaller square and so on, you would pretty quickly produce a Golden Spiral. This is the governing form of growth, and you see this pattern in mollusc shells, in the arrangement of leaves on a plant, and the way flies spiral in towards a light source.

Where else can we find this proportion? Almost everywhere in nature. In the human body, the navel divides the whole body into a Phi section. In the face, the brow divides the face into Phi proportion. The lengths of the bones in the fingers relate to each other in the same way, and so on, right down to the spacing of protein molecules in our DNA. So working with the Golden Proportion is very harmonious to the human body. The Golden Proportion also manifests in Nature as the spiral of the nautilus shell, the orbital spacing of the planets, the way plants grow, and many other processes. There is a mathematical example known as the Fibonacci sequence that demonstrates this. The Fibonacci sequence is a specific number series in which each term is the sum of the two terms preceding it. It begins 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55…. and so on. Can you see the progression there? You add two terms together to get the next one up. Now if we were to divide each term by the one before it, and plot the results on a graph, we would get a wildly up-and-down squiggle that very quickly settles into a slight oscillation around the number 1.61803… Phi. It never gets there exactly (it can’t – this is an irrational number remember).

And finally, did you know that the planet Venus traces out a pentagram in the skies as it moves along its orbit? If the positions of the planet are plotted along the ecliptic (as on an astrological chart, for instance), then over the course of eight years it will appear to reverse direction or go retrograde five times and will trace out a pretty good pentagram! Note the numbers involved here: five and eight. Both adjacent terms in the Fibonacci sequence: another Phi relationship.

The most obvious example of space constructed on pentagonal principles is, of course – the Pentagon in Washington D.C. Here the form is utilised more for its defensive and protective aspects. A much better example is the Universal Hall of the Findhorn Foundation in Scotland, designed by George Ripley. But pentagonal geometry can be found lurking just beneath the surface of many sacred spaces, perhaps defining the layout of a church apse or the pattern of a rose window.

So the next time you visit a Gothic cathedral, pause a while and reflect upon the supreme skills of the Master who designed and laid out the entire space using little more than the straight-edge, compasses and Druid’s cord of the sacred geometer.

That concludes this introduction to Sacred Geometry. We have barely scratched the surface of an entire philosophy, but I hope this has given you a taster. There are plenty of books out there, and best one I know of for getting people ‘into’ Sacred Geometry is Michael S. Schneider’s “A Beginner’s Guide to Understanding the Universe – The Mathematical Archetypes of Nature, Art and Science. A Voyage from 1 to 10.” Don’t be put off by the title; it’s a terrific book with lots of pictures, and is very easy to understand. If you’d like to try something more advanced, try Gyorgy Doczi’s “The Power of Limits: Proportional Harmonies in Nature, Art and Architecture.” This is especially good on the Golden Proportion. Also recommended is John Michell’s posthumously-published opus “How the World is Made: The Story of Creation According to Sacred Geometry”, which is full of wonderful renditions of John’s watercolour sacred geometry expositions.

**© Grahame Gardner 2003**

[1] An irrational number cannot be defined as a fraction *p/q* for any integers *p* and *q*, i.e. it cannot be written as one whole number divided by another. A number is called *algebraic* if it is the root of a polynomial (of any degree) with rational coefficients. Any number that is non-algebraic is called *transcendental*.